The Ministry for the Future (Kim Stanley Robinson)

by Kim Stanley Robinson

'Twas an apocalyptic-feeling day - July 15, 2026 - when wildfire smoke that drifted from Canada had filled the NYC skies with a reddish haze. I was seventeen e-book pages away from completing War and Peace and it would soon be time to select the next book I would read. After reading some Reddit comments in response to the wildfire events which made some dramatic (perhaps rightfully so) statements about climate change and humanity's future, something clicked in my mind and I knew it was time to read The Ministry for the Future.

KSR is one of my favorite authors, so this book has been on my mind as one to read some time, and it always felt like an important one to get to. So, what better moment to start the book in than one where I was feeling a droplet of climate despair? It's kind of like listening to sad music when you're sad. There's a resonance between the moment and the media which makes it just feel right. Plus, I figured it might frame the moment for me - give me a framework of thought, a way to think about the situation, an outlook, maybe even an answer of whether hope or despair should win.

Notes taken while reading

Initial thoughts up to chapter 44 (about a third through)

• Short chapters, I kind of like it. Many perspective shifts, but also we have recurring characters. We get to see the same characters through different lenses - one chapter may be first person for that character, and another may be third person from another person's perspective. This is definitely reminiscent of KSR's other works too.
• I can already feel it changing my outlook, mindset, thinking. Even though I know it's a fictional portrayal, I can feel that KSR is making it seem like a realistic scenario of the way things might happen in the next ten or so years (at least that's the timespan in the book so far). So it feels real and like the things might happen. For sure, the message is relevant to us now. That's clearly why KSR is writing this. The scene where Mary is confronted by Frank feels kind of like KSR shouting to the world, "What you're doing is not enough!". (I feel like that was one of the most impactful scenes of the book so far.) And that is starting to float in my mind too - what we're doing is not enough. It's troubling.
• There was a brief part in one of the interlude chapters (where it's not a particular character's perspective but more like a micro-essay about some relevant topic. Which, by the way, has been feeling very Tolstoyian (again, just finished War and Peace, where Tolstoy interleaved character/plot chapters with mini essays on the philosophy of history)) which talked about species that have gone extinct, and I found that I did not know if species have been going to extinct recently and if so, which ones, and this made me feel like I should keep up to date more with ecological (or just general environmental/science) news/events. Skeptics Guide to the Universe podcast has been giving me a taste of science news updates, but they are just small tidbits.
  • So I'm exploring some podcasts.:
    • Outrage + Optimism: The Climate Podcast - so far, listened to one episode and really liked it - it was a special Q&A episode, so I'm not sure yet what their normal episodes are like, but I liked the feeling of it. Definitely will listen to more.
      • Listening to the July 16, 2026 episode called "Rosebank, Cambo, and the Conversation Christiana Never Got To Have", and feeling another connection to TMFTF. The episode talks about a young activist who hijacked a TED panel she was on where another panelist was a CEO of an oil company - it was supposed to be a 45 minute panel, but when it was her turn to be introduced, she directly spoke out to the CEO (the particular concern was in stopping new fossil fuel projects) and then walked out of the panel (video clip). This feels like a combo of some of the themes in Ministry for the Future for two of the standout scenes so far - 1) Frank confronting Mary, 2) The World economic forum hostage situation. There is power in getting around bureaucracy and getting a message in front of someone in an abnormal way which maybe will affect them emotionally and make it more likely they will pay more attention to it.
    • Living on Earth - Also a climate change + ecology podcast. Listened to one episode so far, and I enjoyed the range of topics it covered and the interviews/clips with real people. But, it's a bit slow and it leans towards being less conversational and I did not find the host compelling. Will give it more chances though.
    • Other podcasts that I haven't tried out yet but that came up in my search^[1]: "Nature Breaking", "In Defense of Plants", "Future Ecologies", "Mongabay Newscast".
  • I just love this feeling of an integrated media experience. Reading a book about climate change, listening to podcasts about climate change, and just it obviously being a pressing topic in this world.
• I'm also reading this at a moment where I've been entering into some vegan spaces in NYC and being around people who are talking about activism and social change. I've been feeling some parallels to this in the book, especially for the concept of "direct action" -- a phrase I heard someone say, in the context of asking about opportunities for veganism-related direct action. Wikipedia says: "Direct action may include activities that can be either violent or nonviolent, targeting people, groups, institutions, actions, or property that its participants deem objectionable." Obviously way more extreme than I hope any vegan activists are doing - but an example of direct action in the book is the scene where the 2500 political leaders / influential / wealthy people were held hostage at their convention and forced to watch "propaganda" essentially trying to sway them to be better people. This was another great scene in the book. It was told from the perspective of one of the convention attendees, which was an infuriating perspective to read from - genius move by KSR.
• I appreciate that KSR is giving us perspectives from many different countries and groups of people, rather than just being US-focused. After all, climate affects all.

Thoughts up to ch 70 (the middle third)

• The book is kind of going exactly how I thought it would after the first third, but also not. It's kind of slower than I expected. But that's kind of the point. Change takes time.
• I do seriously love how we see the slow progression of change though. How little things add up. How there are so so so many factors in the world that must be considered in the climate situation. And also how bold strokes are what cause the most change. Large action taken by government. Or large action taken by... terrorists? Like it or not, this book is depicting a scenario where change is effected by destructive action by anonymous individuals. Though it leads to generally net positive change in this fictional version of the world (so far at least), this isn't exactly an optimistic take. But maybe it's realistic. It makes me find myself hoping that such decisive action is taken in our own future if that's the only way to make change -- and this is an uncomfortable thought. Ideally, change happens due to non-destructive, non-violent means. But as Frank said, "you aren't doing enough". KSR is painting an image of how this timeline of humanity solves the climate crisis. What will it take for our own real reality?
• I also like the depiction of how certain individuals can be key to causing change. Mainly our main gal Mary Murphy, who for example convinces the world banks to start the carbon coin (of course, she is backed by the org of the Ministry of the Future for the research and drive for that idea, so it's not just her - but she is a charismatic leader and her job is to convince governments to actually make changes, and arguably it is her personality/confidence that leads to these changes). Semi-related, I feel like I kind of didn't expect us to retain focus on Mary for so long, because there are surely so many players in the climate emergency game, but it makes sense since this book is the Ministry for the Future and she is its leader. KSR could surely write countless versions of this book that are told from different perspectives in the same universe^[2]. We of course get a taste of this because KSR does not shy away from showing different perspectives or short chapters from other characters too.
• I'm curious of course how the rest of the book will go. It feels like the book will be an overall optimistic take, showing how this timeline will end up saved from the climate crisis. It so far seems like the things are adding up to that. But I could also see there being a twist in the final third where it all doesn't add up to enough and the world gets to the point of no return and humanity is destroyed because of climate. Or, maybe a middleground, where they did too-little too-late, and humanity isn't wiped out, but a major part of the population is and things have to start from scratch or something. I could see the pessimistic outcome being chosen in order to drive action (in real life) to prevent this outcome. But I think I'd prefer the optimistic outcome (I guess I'm an optimist) so that we are instead inspired to make things better. Perhaps art is more effective when it inspires rather than frightens. But perhaps not.
• And there's also the Frank-Mary subplot. I have a feeling that they are either falling in love, or Frank will somehow be an important player or inspiration leading to more change.